Epstein's personal lawyer tells Congress he had no knowledge of financier's crimes

March 19, 2026

Darren Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein's longtime personal attorney who managed his legal affairs and estate, testified before the House Oversight Committee claiming complete ignorance of his client's criminal activities involving sexual abuse of minors. During the closed-door congressional hearing, Indyke stated he never socialized with Epstein, received no reports of abuse, and mistakenly believed Epstein's 2008 claims of not knowing victims were underage. An attorney representing Epstein's victims expressed deep concern about Indyke's professed lack of knowledge given his close professional relationship with the financier.

Who is affected

Jeffrey Epstein's victims (women and girls who were sexually abused)
Darren Indyke (Epstein's personal attorney testifying before Congress)
James Marsh and the survivors he represents
Members of the House Oversight Committee, including Chairman James Comer, Robert Garcia, and Tim Burchett
Former President Bill Clinton (called as witness)
US Attorney General Pam Bondi
Democratic members of the committee who walked out

What action is being taken

The House Oversight Committee is conducting an investigation into the government's handling of allegations and legal cases against Epstein
The committee is interviewing witnesses behind closed doors
Darren Indyke is answering questions during a closed-door congressional interview

Why it matters

This investigation is significant because it seeks to uncover the full extent of how Epstein's crimes persisted for decades and who enabled them. The testimony reveals potential blind spots or willful ignorance among Epstein's inner circle of professionals who may have facilitated his crimes. Understanding who knew what is crucial for holding enablers accountable and ensuring justice for survivors. The investigation also examines whether government agencies properly handled the case, which has implications for how authorities respond to similar crimes involving powerful individuals.

What's next

No explicit next steps stated in the article

Read full article from source: BBC